II. Background Information
SOP and IOPs: The field phasealso called "Special Observing Period" (SOP) lasted from 7 September to 15 November 1999. It consisted of 17 "Intensive Observing Periods" (IOPs), dictated by interesting weather developments and lasting usually a few days. During such IOPs, the available observing systems, including the aircraft, were deployed at an increased, often very intense rate, and rapid scans of the Meteosat were initiated. This report attempts to briefly describe all IOPs in consecutive order.
Scientific Objectives: Table 1 lists the internationally agreed upon scientific objectives. Four of these (marked by stars) represent the main scientific aims of the US program, which are emphasized in this report. In the following chapters, objectives P1-P3 will be called "Wet MAP" and P4-P8 "Dry MAP".
MAP International Scientific Objectives
P1 Orographic Precipitation Mechanisms*
P2 Upper Tropospheric PV Anomalies
P3 Hydrological Measurements for Flood Forecasting
P4 Dynamics of Airflow through Mountain Passes (Gap Flow)*
P5 Unstationary Aspects of Foehn in a Large Valley
P6 Three-dimensional Gravity Wave Breaking*
P7 Potential Vorticity Banners*
P8 Structure of the Planetary Boundary Layer over Steep Orography
*US scientific interest primarily directed toward these objectives
Table 1
Target Areas, Operations Centers and Topography: Fig. 1 gives a map
showing the locations of the scientific target areas, the three operations centers, and some of the
geographical regions referred to in the body of this report. The primary operations center, called
"MOC" (MAP Operations Center), was located at the airport in Innsbruck, Austria. The NCAR Electra,
NOAA P-3 and UK C-130 were based there. A second operations center, called "POC" (Project Operations
Center), was located at the airport in Milano-Linate, Italy.

Figure 1. Location of key areas of MAP: three target areas (frames do not indicate "hard" boundaries); Operations Centers: MOC in Innsbruck, POC in Milano-Linate, COC in Bad Ragaz and Map Data Center (MDC) in Zurich are shown, in addition to geographical locations of some rivers, seas, mountains and countries involved.
The French Merlin and Fokker aircraft were based there. The third operations center, called "COC" (Coordination and Operations Center - Rhine Valley), was located in Bad Ragaz, Switzerland. The Dimona motorglider was based there. The DLR Falcon aircraft was operated out of Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
Atmospheric Conditions: As was expected from the beginning, favorable weather situations resulted in a "bunching" of practically all scientific objectives within a few days, since a cross-Alpine airflow (either from the north or from the south) has the potential of causing heavy precipitation or flooding on the upwind side of the Alps (corresponding to the "Wet MAP" objectives), while triggering foehn-related phenomena (corresponding to the "Dry MAP" objectives) on the downwind side.
Some interesting statistics of the 1999 events, prepared by Prof. Reinhold Steinacker (University of Vienna), bear out this "bunching" clearly (Table 2). His comparison of the 1999 SOP with the past 10 years (Table 3) indicates how favorably the atmosphere behaved in 1999, as some of the phenomena of interest occurred twice as frequently as in the climatological average.
| S | E | P | T | E | M | B | E | R | |||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
| P2 | X X | X X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | P5 | X X | X | X | X X | X | X X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | P4 | X | X | X X | X X | X | X X | X X | |||||||||||||||||
| 9 | P1 | X | X X | X | X X | X | |||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | P6 | N N | N N | N N | |||||||||||||||||||||
| P7 | N N | N N | N N | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IOP | X X | X | X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X |
| O | C | T | O | B | E | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
| P2 | X X | X X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | P5 | X X | X X | X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X | X X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | P4 | X | X X | X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | P1 | X X | X E | X | X | X | X X | X X | E | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | P6 | N | N N | S | N | N N | N | N N | N N | N N | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| P7 | N | N N | S | N | N N | N | N N | N N | N N | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| IOP | X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X | X X |
| N | O | V | E | M | B | E | R | N | NN | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ||||||
| P2 | X X | X | X | 8 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | P5 | X X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X X | 13 | 45 | ||||||||||
| 9 | P4 | X X | X X | X | X X | X | X X | X X | 10 | 40 | ||||||||||
| 9 | P1 | X X | X | E | 9 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | P6 | N | S S | S S | 8 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
| P7 | N | S S | S S | 8 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
| IOP | X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X X | X | X X | X | X X | 17 | 69 |
Table 2.
Calendar of weather phenomena favoring MAP scientific objectives (left) during 1999 SOP (Symbols refer to varying alpine regions). Note "bunching of atmospheric events. (Courtesy Reinhold Steinacker)
Statistics of MAP-related weather events (Courtesy of Reinhold Steinacker)
| DAYS WITH | 10-Yr-MEAN (1989-98) |
MIN. (1989-98) |
MAX. (1989-98) |
SOP-1999 |
% OF 10-Yr MEAN |
| PV-streamers | 3.3 | 1 | 9 | 7.5 | 227 |
| Foehn in Rhine Valley | 16.4 | 9.5 | 28 | 23 | 140 |
| Gap flow in Wipp Valley | 17.4 | 8 | 28.5 | 20 | 115 |
| Heavy precipitation S-Alps | 7.2 | 2 | 20.5 | 11.5 | 160 |
| Gravity Waves | 5.6 | 1 | 10.5 | 12.5 | 223 |
| PV-banners | 5.4 | 1 | 10.5 | 12.5 | 223 |
| PV-banners South of Alps | 2.6 | 0 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 96 |
| Possible IOPs (Periods) | 10.9 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 156 |
| without MAP-event | 40.1 | 25 | 52 | 36 | 90 |
| max. period without event | 14.1 | 6 | 24 | 13 | 92 |
| with 1 or more events | 29.9 | 18 | 45 | 34 | 114 |
| with 2 or more events | 19 | 8 | 30 | 24 | 126 |
| with 3 or more events | 5.9 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 186 |
| with 4 or more events | 3.5 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 294 |
Table 3
Number of days favoring various MAP scientific objectives (left) during 10 year mean as compared to 1999 SOP. Note high frequency of 1999 events.
Observing Systems: As Table 4 shows, the US provided some of the key observing systems to the MAP field phase; among them were NCARs polarimetric Doppler "S-Pol" radar, centerpiece of the ground-based radar array in the Lago Maggiore area (see Fig. 2), the two Doppler radar- and lidar-equipped turbo-prop aircraft (NCAR Electra and NOAA P-3), the NOAA scanning ground-based Doppler lidar installed between the Brenner Pass and Innsbruck (for gap flow) and the NOAA mobile "Doppler on Wheels" (DOW). With their arrival in the field, the US observing systems became part of the MAP international resources, serving all scientific objectives.

Figure 2. MAP Doppler radar array installed in the Lago Maggiore Target Area northwest of Milano, Italy.
US Observing Systems in MAP
1) Airborne
(132 used)
b. NOAA P-3 with Doppler radar: 105 Research hours
(96 used)
c. NCAR/NASA GPS Dropsondes (225)
d. DLR Falcon 20 research hours
2) Ground-based
a. NCAR S-POL polarimetric Doppler radar: 7 Sept 8 Nov
b. Univ. of Oklahoma Doppler on Wheels (DOW): 17 Sept 6 Nov
c. NOAA scanning Doppler lidar 2 Oct 14 Nov
d. U. of Washington OPRA radar (vertically pointing): 17 Sept 15 Nov
Table 4
U.S. Funding Agencies and Project Personnel: The main funding agencies of the US, supporting both the PIs and observing systems, are shown in Table 5.
The US sent over 120 people into the field, including 60 from NCAR. They are listed in Appendix A, and represent about half of the international participation. Table 6a provides a list of the 13 participating countries.
This Report: Obviously the scientific results of MAP will not be known for some time. Nevertheless, we have attempted to provide some interesting pictorial examples to some of the main events and scientific objectives of interest. This report focuses more on the flexible than the fixed platforms, especially the missions of the seven participating aircraft (see Table 6b), since these are most variable during the many IOPs, and probably of primary interest to the scientific readers of this report.
US Major Funding Agencies for MAP
National Science Foundation (NSF)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Table 5
List of Participating Countries in MAP
Austria
Canada
France
Germany
Greece
Italy
Croatia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States of America
Table 6a.
MAP Research Aircraft
NCAR Electra (US)
NOAA P-3 (US)
Falcon (Germany)
Merlin (France)
Fokker ARAT (France)
C-130 (UK)
Dimona motorglider (Switzerland)
Table 6b
This report is based on the information available at this time from various resources, mostly via Internet (including the MAP "Field Data Catalog") or from personal communications. Since such information, shortly after a field phase, is generally quite uneven, this report is by necessity, somewhat unbalanced. The efforts of many co-workers to contribute to this report are acknowledged and greatly appreciated.
A more complete international summary of the MAP field phase is presently being prepared for publication by an international team under the direction of Philippe Bougeault (Météo France, Scientific Director during the first half of the field phase). That report should appear later this year in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (AMS).